<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cellphone radiation: Do you really want to know?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessbrief.com/cellphone-radiation-do-you-really-want-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/cellphone-radiation-do-you-really-want-to-know/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/cellphone-radiation-do-you-really-want-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-5523</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=3287#comment-5523</guid>
		<description>Before you jump in the RF hazard debate, you should do a bit of fact checking. The SAR limits are not set by device manufacturers. RF safety standards were evolved by the IEEE and ANSI, both impartial scientific and standards groups with a wide constituency.  RF safety standards for the public are set at levels 10 times less than any known effect. In operation, most cellphones expose the user to even a fraction of that because the power level of cellphones is set to the lowest possible level by the system to avoid intrasystem interference. Only in a rural area, far from a tower, would a user typically experience anything like the safe limit. As a practical matter, with everyone using cellphones and otherwise being in the electronic fog of WiFi, radio, TV, radars, etc., shouldn&#039;t we be dropping like flies? But, duh, the rate of brain cancer has actually decreased in the US! Go figure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you jump in the RF hazard debate, you should do a bit of fact checking. The SAR limits are not set by device manufacturers. RF safety standards were evolved by the IEEE and ANSI, both impartial scientific and standards groups with a wide constituency.  RF safety standards for the public are set at levels 10 times less than any known effect. In operation, most cellphones expose the user to even a fraction of that because the power level of cellphones is set to the lowest possible level by the system to avoid intrasystem interference. Only in a rural area, far from a tower, would a user typically experience anything like the safe limit. As a practical matter, with everyone using cellphones and otherwise being in the electronic fog of WiFi, radio, TV, radars, etc., shouldn&#8217;t we be dropping like flies? But, duh, the rate of brain cancer has actually decreased in the US! Go figure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_b492eba2bd2158c8d92ac07a4ec8b691_page_84f81153ead5b71f01a87219d52932c2
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      request URI is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.197s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.businessbrief.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:15:13 GMT
ETag:               "7b2b88d93baddfce17d14d9ec2aad841"
Link:               <http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=3287>; rel=shortlink
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->
