Want an example of how high the stakes have risen for companies who get nabbed for hiring illegal immigrants? Try this: A federal appeals court has affirmed a 10-year prison sentence for an owner who hired illegals to work in his company.
Richard Rosenbaum pleaded guilty to charges of conspiring to defraud the U.S. and harboring illegal aliens.
A federal investigation in Michigan had revealed that Rosenbaum’s company had hired hundreds of illegal aliens and paid them in cash – thereby avoiding paying the government employment taxes, Social Security and Medicare. According to the feds, the company had cheated the IRS out of more than $16 million.
Rosenbaum appealed the stiff sentence, citing his lack of a prior criminal record and his cooperation in the government’s investigation.
But the judge was unmoved. Rosenbaum’s cooperation wasn’t all that substantial, the court said, and it didn’t begin until a co-defendant turned informant. The sentence was within federal guidelines, the judge added.
As the case shows, the feds aren’t letting up. To the contrary, the IRS has jumped into the game to hammer employers over the tax-avoidance issues of illegal hires.
Cite: U.S. v. Rosenbaum
BusinessBrief.com delivers the latest business news once a week to the inboxes of over 180,000 executives.
Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to BusinessBrief!
advertisement
Tags: court decisions, federal court, illegal aliens, Richard Rosenbaum
December 4th, 2009 at 11:51 am
We need more strong sanctions like this against employers who hire illegals. The only way to return to the pro-immigration policy we need to keep the United States economy vibrant is to have strong workplace protections for U.S. workers. Hiring illegal immigrants to reduce business costs is a race to the bottom. We need citizens if we want to have a society worth living in, not just cheap labor. “In-sourcing” illegal labor will turn the U.S. into a banana republic. Fences don’t work. Hadrian’s Wall in Roman Britain and the Great Wall of China were obsolete before they were finished.
What about keeping out the drug trade, you ask? Decriminalize it — all of it. And tax it. And require much stiffer penalites for DUI. Cost savings from having far fewer than the current 3 million people in jail, along with drug tax revenues, will produce major savings, and will help reduce the cost of government for businesses. Health care costs will be reduced if we start treating substance abuse as a public health problem, not a crime. The result will be more functioning people out on the streets seeking productive work and creating legal businesses.
The American business community has been highly hypocritical and unpatriotic when it comes to regulating illegal immigration at the workplace — particularly businesses that seek to profit from low wage labor, including agribusiness, food processing, restaurant and hospitality businesses and some manufacturing. There are good business reasons for supporting a functioning democracy. It’s time business people started speaking out and doing their part to create these changes.
December 4th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
We won’t stop illegal immigration until the countries that they’re coming from are able to provide living-wage jobs. But, I applaud the enforcement of the law, especially because it seems the sentence was more for tax evasion than hiring undocumented workers. I am tired of paying my share of taxes and covering for the fat cats who don’t. By the way, Mr. Baker is wrong when he says that decriminalizing illegal drugs will change much. In Europe, one of the biggest rackets is smuggling alcohol and cigarettes to avoid taxes. In this country, everyone from the Mafia to Middle East terrorist groups has smuggled cigarettes from low tax states to high tax states. Don’t look for easy answers, just support the efforts of those who have to enforce the laws we have.
December 8th, 2009 at 10:34 am
Mr. Andrew Baker,
You probably don’t have a child of your own to say that illegal drugs should be decriminalized.
December 8th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
As a matter of fact, I’ve raised five children, a few of whom are now in the late teen age group most susceptible to exposure to drugs, so I think about this issue every day and struggle with the best ways to nurture productive young adults who will contribute positively to a free society. I also have painful personal experience with the impacts of substance abuse on families. However, the major tragedies that have occurred in my family have resulted from abuse of substances that are legal — alcohol and prescription medication. This has reinforced my belief that criminalizing drugs does not solve the problem, and in many cases only adds another set of problems that then need solving — cost of imprisonment, how to employ people with criminal records etc. That said, I recognize that drugs are a very hot button issue because the issues are not just societal — they touch all of us personally. I don’t pretend that there are simple solutions. Decriminalization brings a new set of problems. I just happen to believe that solving these problems will be cheaper and produce better outcomes than criminalizing our national drug problem.