<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BusinessBrief.com &#187; FUTA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessbrief.com/tag/futa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessbrief.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama proposes increase in FUTA for employers</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/obama-proposes-increase-in-futa-for-employers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessbrief.com/obama-proposes-increase-in-futa-for-employers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal & Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Unemployment Tax Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=16663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House has a problem: State unemployment funds are shrinking. And the Obama administration has decided that an increase in the wage base for the Federal Unemployment Tax Act tax is the way to fix the problem. In a nutshell, the White House is proposing that the wage base for FUTA tax paid by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-881" title="money1" src="http://www.businessbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/money1.jpg" alt="money1" width="360" height="376" /></p>
<p>The White House has a problem: State unemployment funds are shrinking. And the Obama administration has decided that an increase in the wage base for the Federal Unemployment Tax Act tax is the way to fix the problem. <span id="more-16663"></span></p>
<p>In a nutshell, the White House is proposing that the wage base for FUTA tax paid by employers be increased from $7,000 to $15,000.</p>
<p>Under current law, employers pay 6.2% in taxes on the first $7,000 of earnings paid to each worker &#8212; a level that&#8217;s been in effect since 1983. If the proposal becomes law, an employer’s maximum FUTA contribution per employee would increase from $434 to $930. The increase would go into effect in 2014.</p>
<p>Even with the delayed effective date, several congressional Republicans said an increased cost for employers could hurt the economy and job growth. House majority leader Eric Cantor of Virginia suggested immediately suspending the FUTA tax and making up the difference &#8212; $7 billion &#8212; with spending cuts.</p>
<p><strong>How bad is the problem?</strong><br />
At least 30 states have exhausted their unemployment funds and have had to borrow $41 billion from the federal government. The biggest borrowers:</p>
<ul>
<li> California</li>
<li>Illinois</li>
<li>Michigan</li>
<li>New York</li>
<li>Pennsylvania</li>
</ul>
<p>If Congress and the administration make no changes in current law, the borrowing states will start paying interest on the loans in September. Where will they find the money? Most states don&#8217;t want to raise taxes on workers, so employers likely would see a special assessment &#8212; meaning it&#8217;s a pick-your-poison predicament for businesses: pay the state or pay Uncle Sam.</p>
<p>Would the increase be temporary? Economists say it&#8217;ll take about decade for states to climb out of the hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessbrief.com/obama-proposes-increase-in-futa-for-employers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alert: Nationwide biz audit pushed back to February</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/alert-nationwide-biz-audit-pushed-back-to-february/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessbrief.com/alert-nationwide-biz-audit-pushed-back-to-february/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal & Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=5082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An audit of 6,000 businesses that was scheduled for November has been pushed back, giving you a little more time to make sure your company&#8217;s records are in order. As previously reported, the Internal Revenue Service was gearing up for the audits to uncover unpaid business and payroll taxes. IRS is still planning the nationwide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An audit of 6,000 businesses that was scheduled for November has been pushed back, giving you a little more time to make sure your company&#8217;s records are in order. <span id="more-5082"></span></p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.businessbrief.com/feds-plan-6000-biz-audits-what-theyre-looking-for/">previously reported</a>, the Internal Revenue Service was gearing up for the audits to uncover unpaid business and payroll taxes. IRS is still planning the nationwide audit, but is pushing it back to February.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what auditors will be looking at:</p>
<ul>
<li>Three federal taxes collected, paid and/or remitted by employers &#8212; employee income taxes deducted by the employer, FICA and FUTA.</li>
<li>Employment taxes related to four areas &#8212; worker classification, fringe benefits, reimbursed expenses and compensation of owner employees.</li>
</ul>
<p>The audits have been triggered by an IRS study that shows a &#8220;tax gap&#8221; in the billions of dollars for unpaid business and payroll taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessbrief.com/alert-nationwide-biz-audit-pushed-back-to-february/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘We keep that paperwork for how long again?’ A record-retention checklist</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/%e2%80%98we-keep-that-paper-for-how-long-again%e2%80%99-a-record-retention-checklist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessbrief.com/%e2%80%98we-keep-that-paper-for-how-long-again%e2%80%99-a-record-retention-checklist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Azara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record retention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=2042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s a fine line: You certainly don’t want to discard records too soon – that would make an audit even more of a headache.  Still, you don’t want to hold on to paper any longer than you have to. Some companies are using the current slowdown in business to do a little housekeeping. Here&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a fine line: You certainly don’t want to discard records too soon – that would make an audit even more of a headache.  Still, you don’t want to hold on to paper any longer than you have to. <span id="more-2042"></span><br />
Some companies are using the current slowdown in business to do a little housekeeping.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a record-retention refresher worth circulating throughout your finance department:<br />
<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>3 years:</strong> bank deposit slips, budgets and employment applications for people you didn’t hire.</p>
<p><strong>4 years:</strong> vacation/sick pay records, FICA/FUTA/Income Tax withholding and payroll registers.</p>
<p><strong>5 years:</strong> accounting authorizations, accounting correspondence, dental benefits, garnishments, life insurance benefits and safety reports.</p>
<p><strong>6 years:</strong> internal audit docs, insurance appraisals and salesperson commission reports.</p>
<p><strong>7 years:</strong> A/P and A/R ledgers, aging reports, A/R invoices, accounts written off, bank reconciliations, bank statements, charge slips, expense reports, petty cash records, purchase orders, vendor invoices, voucher check copies, attendance records, medical benefits and time reports.</p>
<p><strong>8 years:</strong> salary histories.</p>
<p><strong>10 years:</strong> canceled checks, workers’ comp benefits, expired insurance policies, canceled leases, canceled notes receivable, employee withholding exemption certificates and receiving documents.</p>
<p>Everything else goes on your company’s “never-purge” list.</p>
<p>Note: When in doubt, check with your company&#8217;s CPA firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessbrief.com/%e2%80%98we-keep-that-paper-for-how-long-again%e2%80%99-a-record-retention-checklist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_b492eba2bd2158c8d92ac07a4ec8b691_page_d45d1fc3840b60c3a0f965f236758dc3
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      request URI is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.286s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.businessbrief.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:00:57 GMT
ETag:               "ec26bff19bb9340e5352e7bc34923023"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->
