<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BusinessBrief.com &#187; payroll tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessbrief.com/tag/payroll-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessbrief.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>American Jobs Act: What&#8217;s in it for you</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/american-jobs-act-whats-in-it-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessbrief.com/american-jobs-act-whats-in-it-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal & Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Jobs Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=21054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama&#8217;s proposal has some major implications &#8212; tax and otherwise &#8212; for business. Here’s a look at three major points in the president’s American Jobs Act and four related measures: Equipment deduction. Businesses would get a one-year extension of the tax break that allows a full dollar-for-dollar deduction for all equipment purchases. Payroll tax [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-807" title="capitalbuild3" src="http://www.businessbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/capitalbuild3.jpg" alt="capitalbuild3" width="360" height="240" /></p>
<p>President Obama&#8217;s proposal has some major implications &#8212; tax and otherwise &#8212; for business. <span id="more-21054"></span></p>
<p>Here’s a look at three major points in the president’s American Jobs Act and four related measures:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Equipment deduction.</strong> Businesses would get a one-year extension of the tax break that allows a full dollar-for-dollar deduction for all equipment purchases.</li>
<li><strong>Payroll tax cuts. </strong>All businesses with annual payrolls up to $5 million would see the payroll tax cut in half, from 6.2% to 3.1%. Plus, business would get a payroll-tax holiday on wages paid to new hires.</li>
<li><strong>Employer tax credits.</strong> Businesses that hire an applicant who’s been out of work at least six months will get a tax credit of up to $4,000 per hire.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition to those three, the president has proposed:</p>
<ul>
<li>raising $105 billion plus private-sector money to go toward infrastructure projects, such as modernizing roads, bridges and schools</li>
<li>providing $35 billion to local governments to prevent layoffs of teachers and emergency personnel</li>
<li>cutting the employee portion of payroll taxes – on earnings up to $106,800 &#8212; from 6.2% to 4.2% for all of 2011 and a further cut to 3.1% in 2012, and</li>
<li>spending $45 billion to extend unemployment benefits and provide job training to the long-term unemployed.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Sources:</strong> Associated Press, Congressional Record, New York Times.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessbrief.com/american-jobs-act-whats-in-it-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New fed hiring credit has some snares to watch for</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/new-fed-hiring-credit-has-some-snares-to-watch-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessbrief.com/new-fed-hiring-credit-has-some-snares-to-watch-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIRE Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 179 depreciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=8047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, just about everyone knows about the HIRE Act, or what&#8217;s known as &#8220;the jobs bill,&#8221; and the benefits of taking on new employees. There&#8217;s a bit more to it than meets the eye, however, and understanding the fine details &#8212; and avoiding mistakes &#8212; can make a big difference for employers. First, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-825" title="istock_000000331737xsmall" src="http://www.businessbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/istock_000000331737xsmall.jpg" alt="istock_000000331737xsmall" width="360" height="300" /></p>
<p>By now, just about everyone knows about the HIRE Act, or what&#8217;s known as &#8220;the jobs bill,&#8221; and the benefits of taking on new employees. There&#8217;s a bit more to it than meets the eye, however, and understanding the fine details &#8212; and avoiding mistakes &#8212; can make a big difference for employers. <span id="more-8047"></span></p>
<p>First, the basics of the Act:</p>
<ul>
<li>Qualifying hires must occur after February 3, 2010, and before January 1, 2011.</li>
<li>For qualified hires, employers will receive a 6.2% payroll tax incentive, in effect exempting them from their share of Social Security taxes on wages paid to these workers after the date of enactment.</li>
<li>For each qualified hire retained for at least a year, employers can claim an additional general business tax credit, up to $1,000 per worker, when they file their 2011 income tax returns.</li>
</ul>
<p>Those are the benefits. Here&#8217;s what you and your HR department have to watch out for:</p>
<p>Anyone you hire must have been unemployed for at least 60 days. Those individuals must be able to certify &#8220;by signed affidavit&#8221; and under penalty of perjury, that they &#8220;have not been employed more than 40 hours in the 60-day period ending on the date such individual gains such employment.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>You cannot take the credit if the individual is hired to replace a person who is terminated, &#8220;unless such other person is separated from employment voluntarily or for cause.&#8221;</li>
<li>There&#8217;s a wage rule you have to meet to qualify for the $1,000 tax credit for keeping the person on for at least 52 weeks: Wages paid in the last 26 weeks must equal at least 80% of wages paid in the first 26 weeks. This is the credit that can be taken on an employer’s income tax return filed in 2011.</li>
<li>This reduced tax withholding will have no effect on the employee’s future Social Security benefits, and employers would still need to withhold the employee’s 6.2% share of Social Security taxes, as well as income taxes. The employer and employee’s shares of Medicare taxes would also still apply to these wages.</li>
</ul>
<p>Something to discuss with your accountant: Another part of the bill encourages investment by extending the Section 179 depreciation deduction at its 2008/2009 higher amount of $250,000 with a phase-out when expenditures hit $800,000. The higher level deduction expired at the end of 2009, pending further action by Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessbrief.com/new-fed-hiring-credit-has-some-snares-to-watch-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A business tax-cut proposal that just might work</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/a-business-tax-cut-proposal-that-just-might-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessbrief.com/a-business-tax-cut-proposal-that-just-might-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=6465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Capitol Hill tax-cut proposals for businesses are about as common as blue suits. There&#8217;s something different about the latest plan, and it just might work. Actually, there are two differences that set the new plan apart from others like it: It has bipartisan support in the U.S. Senate. The plan is being championed by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capitol Hill tax-cut proposals for businesses are about as common as blue suits. There&#8217;s something different about the latest plan, and it just might work. <span id="more-6465"></span></p>
<p>Actually, there are two differences that set the new plan apart from others like it:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>It has bipartisan support in the U.S. Senate.</strong> The plan is being championed by the partnership of Democrat Charles Schumer and Republican Orrin Hatch &#8212; two names you&#8217;re unlikely to see linked to any other piece of legislation.</li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s quick and simple.</strong> Most other plans involve complicated schemes in which businesses would have to wait for a tax credit or deduction.</li>
</ol>
<p>Here&#8217;s how the Hatch/Schumer plan would work:</p>
<ul>
<li>If, this year, you hire someone who has been unemployed for at least 60 days, you&#8217;ll receive an immediate exemption from paying the 6.2% Social Security payroll tax on that person&#8217;s salary. No waiting for a credit or deduction; the exemption starts the day you hire the person. The exemption is prorated for the year. So, for instance, you&#8217;d save more by hiring someone now than if you waited. That&#8217;s an obvious incentive to kickstart employment.</li>
<li>There&#8217;s no limit on the exemption. You&#8217;d receive it for every eligible person you hired in 2010.</li>
<li>You&#8217;d get a $1,000 tax credit in 2011 for every eligible person you hired in 2010 and kept on the payroll for at least one year.</li>
</ul>
<p>Because of the support for and ease of the plan, many Senate observers says the idea has a real chance of passing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessbrief.com/a-business-tax-cut-proposal-that-just-might-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk
Key:                w3tc_b492eba2bd2158c8d92ac07a4ec8b691_page_cf2ff9b433b44c67d211f3e1d2bc6d18
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      request URI is rejected
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.211s
Header info:
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.8.5.2
X-Pingback:         http://www.businessbrief.com/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:12:55 GMT
ETag:               "048137a55f0d2fb89f47417a862f402e"
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->
