<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Brief &#187; solar power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businessbrief.com/tag/solar-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businessbrief.com</link>
	<description>Business News and Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Solar power: Not the deal we thought it would be</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/solar-power-not-the-deal-we-thought-it-would-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessbrief.com/solar-power-not-the-deal-we-thought-it-would-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=29449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clean, green solar power is getting a black eye as a renewable energy. Problem: Solar is  turning out to be overly expensive and in constant need of rate payer subsidies, to the tune of $1.3 billion a year. The real stinger on this cost is that the extra solar bill gets passed on to businesses [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clean, green solar power is getting a black eye as a renewable energy.</p>
<p><span id="more-29449"></span></p>
<p>Problem: Solar is  turning out to be overly expensive and in constant need of rate payer subsidies, to the tune of $1.3 billion a year.</p>
<p>The real stinger on this cost is that the extra solar bill gets passed on to businesses and residential rate payers – who don’t participate in the solar program, according to an analysis by Southern California Edison (SCE).</p>
<p>Under a California program, residential and business customers let the power companies install solar panels on their roofs.</p>
<p>By law, utilities are required to run this program until solar-power generation reaches certain thresholds. This solar-generated electricity is then bought by power companies at the same rate the company then resells to their customers.</p>
<p>To make up for the cost, utilities have to raise rates on all their customers.</p>
<p>Go <a href="http://www.sce.com/solarleadership/gosolar/mash/MASHResources/incentive-application-faq.htm#Q1">here</a> for 21 Q&amp;As on solar power and its costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessbrief.com/solar-power-not-the-deal-we-thought-it-would-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green energy push jeopardizes U.S. security?</title>
		<link>http://www.businessbrief.com/green-energy-push-jeopardizes-u-s-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessbrief.com/green-energy-push-jeopardizes-u-s-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tguay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessbrief.com/?p=11564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big push to develop green energy technologies won&#8217;t break America&#8217;s dependence on foreign suppliers.  Instead, the U.S. will end up even more dependent on a single, unreliable partner &#8212; China. The problem: Virtually all of the critical raw materials America needs to make wind and solar power systems are only located in China. And, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big push to develop green energy technologies won&#8217;t break America&#8217;s dependence on foreign suppliers.  Instead, the U.S. will end up even more dependent on a single, unreliable partner &#8212; China. <span id="more-11564"></span></p>
<p>The problem: Virtually all of the critical raw materials America needs to make wind and solar power systems are only located in China.</p>
<p>And, China is quite willing to use its monopoly on these materials as a political weapon against countries that don&#8217;t kowtow to Beijing, says a <a href="http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba739" target="_blank">new report by the National Center for Policy Analysis</a>.</p>
<p>Already, China has used its monopoly power to deprive other countries of access to its rare earth minerals. Japan has been locked out in a dispute with China over the arrest of a Chinese fishing boat captain who collided with a Japanese coast guard vessel.</p>
<p>The Center warns that trying to switch away from an oil-based economy, one with many foreign suppliers, to one that relies on green energy spells trouble for America, especially if America and China class over foreign policy.</p>
<p>For example, to make solar panels, any country requires access to the rare element tellurium. China hosts the world&#8217;s only tellurium mine.</p>
<p>Already China has displaced the U.S. as a major manufacturer of solar panels. In 2003, the U.S. made 14% of the world&#8217;s solar panels while China made about 1%. By 2009, the U.S. share of the market has fallen to 4% while China grabbed a 35% share of the solar market.</p>
<p>How? As China ramped up production and offered cheaper products, prices for U.S. solar panels fell by nearly 40%.</p>
<p>To build wind turbines, General Electric needs access to the rare earth mineral neodymium. GE&#8217;s entire supply comes from China.</p>
<p>As America tries to develop a market for electric vehicles, China again is the crucial supplier of materials &#8212; neodymium and lanthanum &#8212; needed to make the advanced batteries that will power them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessbrief.com/green-energy-push-jeopardizes-u-s-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
